Seizing the Initiative Through Creative Thinking Versus Reacting to the Enemy local copyby Grothe, SAMS paper, Leadership must be committed to learning, underwrite experimentation, and create an environment that generates creative thought and innovation.
Knowledge Rating is a strategy for assessing what students already know about a reading topic by having them independently rate how well they know the key vocabulary.
This prereading strategy encourages students to think metacognitively about their conceptual background for each word being introduced. First, the teacher reviews the vocabulary to activate prior knowledge and to identify any confusing or unfamiliar words.
Based on the vocabulary, students make some preliminary predictions about the text content and organization, guided by the teacher's focusing questions. Students then gather data during subsequent vocabulary instruction and actual reading, and, finally, they monitor and refine their insights after reading.
This strategy helps the teacher get a realistic gauge of students' expressive and receptive vocabulary knowledge—that is, words they actually understand versus words they simply recognize.
The teacher is then in a strategic position to prioritize certain words for focused and substantive preteaching. This vocabulary list also signals to students the relative importance of these terms and the likelihood that they will appear in some form of assessment.
STEPS Select the words from a reading selection that are most critical to grasping the essential concepts to be learned.
Distribute copies of the Vocabulary Knowledge Rating Chart. When students have the list, tell them that they will start thinking about the new reading material by assessing what they already know about the topic. As you read each word aloud, ask students to rate their word knowledge by checking one of the columns on the chart: Use the ratings for a unified-class discussion.
Tally how many students actually know each word or think they know and encourage them to share their knowledge. In this way, you will be able to gauge just how much prereading instruction you will need to provide. Ask focusing questions that help students predict text content and organization based on this word list and thus help students establish a purpose for reading.
During any guided-reading activities, be sure to point out the target vocabulary. After completing subsequent vocabulary instruction and reading the assigned selection, have students rerate themselves.
Then refine vocabulary knowledge. Return to the selection, or use reference books, to clarify words that are still problematic. Let students know that this Knowledge Rating tool is an organizer for study. Any words on the list will be priorities for vocabulary assessment in a subsequent quiz or test.
Students should also be held accountable for using these terms in related oral or written work; you can include them in assessment protocols such as writing rubrics. Remind students not to indicate that they "know" a word Rating 3 if they simply "recognize" a word Rating 2.
Also encourage them not to hesitate to indicate that they do not recognize or understand a word at all Rating 1. Invite them to be honest, as you plan to use their input to make important decisions about what words you will preteach and discuss.
After students have independently completed the self-assessment process, place them in small groups to share what if anything they know about each word. Ask them to identify any words consider specifying a number, like 3—5 for which they have either some or considerable group knowledge, and to be prepared to share this information with the unified class.
Make sure each group's collectively generated definitions and examples are reported separately for each word.
There should be at least three different spokespersons. This small group sharing and preparation tends to animate a subsequent unified-class debriefing of their collective understandings, confusion, questions, and predictions about what the author will actually be discussing.
Follow up this assessment and brainstorming process with focused instructional front-loading of terms that are totally unfamiliar, somewhat familiar, or clearly misunderstood.Learn why the Common Core is important for your child. What parents should know; Myths vs.
facts. SARAN IS SIX. His family is new to our small, rural town. He is embarrassed when I ask him about the Hindi he speaks at home.
At the parent–teacher interview, Saran’s mother nods while I speak, nods again as the older sister translates.
We will write a custom essay sample on Teachers Meeting Standards specifically for you for only $ $/page. Order now Like in both of the standards described, teaching isn’t just about teaching the students.
There is way more to teaching then just that, and to be a successful teacher you need to be able to contribute to the. PRIMARY SOURCES • Landmark Documents • Court Cases • Supreme Court Cases • Newspaper Articles • Obituaries VOICES • Overview & Resources • Asian American • Children • Civil Rights • Immigrant • Native Americans • Texas • Women MULTIMEDIA • Digital Stories.
Article 1 Malm, B. & Löfgren, H. (, Nov). Teacher competence and students' conflict handling strategies. Research in Education, (76), The. Professional Teaching Standards For Graduate Teachers Education Essay.
Print Reference this. Published: 23rd March, Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. .